WoGF Book Review: Graceling by Kristin Cashore

Posted on by

A few weeks ago, I posted about the Women of Genre Fiction Reading Challenge over at Worlds Without End.  As predicted, writing the review is the hard part.  So, more than three weeks after finishing the book, here’s my first: a review of Graceling by Kristin Cashore.

I’ve been hearing good things about Graceling for years, but the description always put me off.  A book about a smart, beautiful teenage girl with a magical talent for killing?  Right.  Maybe it’s just me, but I’ve read perhaps too many urban fantasies in the last few years about hot young women who are deadly with their weapons of choice, and I just wasn’t in the mood for another one, even if it was set in a fairy-tale kingdom.

Turns out I was wrong.  When I finally picked it up from my local library, Graceling upended all my expectations.  Katsa kills, yes, and she’s magically good at it, but that’s not what the book is about.  It’s about Katsa herself, and what it means for her to be forced to act as a thug and a killer when all she wants is to be a good person.

The book opens with Katsa in the midst of a secret rescue.  Secret, not because the kidnappers might manage to stop her, but because she can’t let her uncle, the king, find out.  I love that she doesn’t even know the victim, and she’s saving him just because it’s the right thing to do.  And contrary to my fears, she’s very careful not to kill anybody, not even the one witness who might have recognized her.

Katsa is the very definition of a strong female protagonist.  Not the physical strength, though obviously she has that in abundance, but the strength of character.  She is her own person, and she doesn’t need to hide behind or depend on anyone else; but at the same time, she can accept help with grace.  She doesn’t stupidly insist on doing everything herself and shutting out the world.  When things go wrong, she takes action—and responsibility.

I thought the interactions between her and the two potential love interests were very well done, and thought-provoking in ways you don’t find in most teen books.  When her friend turns out to be in love with her, she has the admittedly cliché reaction of having never seen it coming.  But instead of being flattered by his protectiveness, she feels insulted; after all, she can defend herself better than anyone else in seven kingdoms.  His assumption that she would change her mind about wanting children was particularly condescending, and I loved Katsa’s disgusted reaction.

I think it’s so important for young adult books in particular to show young women that they don’t need to conform to the expectations of a handsome man just because he likes her.  Her life doesn’t need to become about him—even when she does like him back.  When Katsa finally does fall in love, I love that she doesn’t turn to melodrama and decide that she can never be with him without being owned by him, so they must break their hearts and never be together.  But she also doesn’t just jump into the sack with him.  She takes the time to think about the consequences, not only the immediate ones, but whether she can be his lover without feeling owned, whether she’ll be able to leave, and how it will affect his feelings when she does.

The final showdown with the evil king was abrupt, but I realized, reading the denouement afterward, that it fit.  The encounter didn’t deserve any more page time, because it wasn’t actually the focus of the book.  Katsa’s acceptance of herself is the focus, and her relationships with the other characters.  It was only right to spend more time dealing with the consequences of the king’s evil and Katsa’s role in his demise (sorry, hope that didn’t spoil anything…but come on, was he ever going to win?) than with the actual encounter.

Graceling is a thoughtful, imaginative, and thoroughly enjoyable book, which I heartily recommend.  I can’t wait to read the rest of the series.

Women of Genre Fiction Reading Challenge

Posted on by

2013 Worlds Without End Women of Genre Fiction Reading ChallengeNormally, the last thing I need is encouragement to read more, but when I saw the 2013 Worlds Without End Women of Genre Fiction Reading Challenge, I had to join.  The challenge: 12 books, 12 months, 12 reviews, all by women authors I’ve never read before.  I love the idea, because there’s still an unconscious bias in our society to regard books written by men as being more worthy of merit, and the best way to combat it is through awareness of the bias and exposure to all the great fiction out there by women.  I encourage everyone to join!

Considering my prolific reading habits, 12 books is no challenge, nor that they’re written by women.  (My statistics on this are actually pretty fascinating.  A full 73% of the books I read last year were by women.  However, only 55% of my “favorites” shelf on Goodreads are by women, so it’s possible I still have some of that bias.  It’s also possible that my reading habits have changed, and my favorites haven’t caught up yet.)  The “never read before” restriction may cause slightly more trouble, for the same reason, but that’s the point of the challenge–to discover new women authors.  No matter how many I’ve read, I’m sure there are plenty left to choose from.

No, I expect the challenge for me will be the reviews.  I occasionally review books on Goodreads or Amazon, but they tend to be very short, just a quick description of what I loved about the book (or, very occasionally, disliked).  I’ve never attempted to summarize the plot, or do any sort of deeper analysis.  I want to be more complete with these 12 reviews, and it will be a new sort of writing for me.

I’m considering posting my reviews here, though it’s a little outside my normal scope.  Does anyone have strong feelings about it, one way or another?

Happy New Year

Posted on by
Happy new year

Happy new year (Photo credit: Amodiovalerio Verde)

Happy New Year!

I’ve been kind of quiet lately, most of which I can blame on the holidays (Three weeks off work!  Snow!  My annual Christmas cold!), but not entirely.  This wasn’t intended to be the kind of blog where I talk about everything that’s going on in my life, and unfortunately, most of my energy this winter has been spent dealing with Things That Are Not Writing.

I don’t really go in for New Year’s resolutions, but I did take a little time to think about my writing goals for the year: finish my rewrite of Unborn by April 1, get a first draft of my next novel (working title: North) finished by October 1.  It also seemed like a good time to reassess the website.  Breaking news: I’m probably not cut out for a regular, post-a-week schedule.

And you know what?  I think that’s fine.

When I started the blog, I read a lot of advice, most of which focused on Building a Platform, i.e. how to get as big an audience as possible, and of course they all stressed the importance of getting good content out to your readers on a regular, predictable basis.  But that was never really the point for me.  I never expected my blog readers to be potential fans who would start clamoring for my work before I’ve ever been published.  No, I’m pretty sure the readers I’ve managed to attract are all writers like me.  (And family.  Hi Dad!)

Ultimately, the blog is for me.  There’s no point in writing posts just to be writing.  I’ll save that for my fiction, thanks.  The internet at large, and the writing community in particular, don’t need me regurgitating the same old advice, retreading the same tired topics.  Instead, I’m hoping to dig a little deeper.  I read constantly, but I tend to get lazy, and not spend much time thinking about any one book or article.  One of the reasons I started the blog was to encourage myself to slow down and establish a coherent opinion on Things I Think Are Important.  I know myself.  That’s not going to happen once a week.  But over the course of 2013, I’m hoping it’ll start to happen more often.

Non-Romance in the Rain Wilds

Posted on by

I love a good romantic subplot, but they generally come in only two flavors: the True Love Story, and the Fun Fling (or disastrous, ill-conceived fling, as the case may be).  I’ve seen both done well and poorly, believable and far-fetched, but it occurs to me that there’s a third type of romantic plot that we rarely see, and may be more important than the other two: the Non-Romance.

One of the biggest criticisms of romance in fiction is how unrealistic it often is.  Too-good-to-be-true heroes who act like women wish they would; young people whose first love turns out to be their perfect match; impossibly good-looking suitors lining up to fight over the heroine.  I’m the last person to naysay young love, having married my high school sweetheart, but I think it’s important to show that there doesn’t always have to be a relationship.  Not just through the absence of romance, but through consideration and rejection of it.

To explain what I mean, I’ll need to use an example.  Over the Thanksgiving holiday, I read the first three books of Robin Hobb’s latest series, The Rain Wilds Chronicles.  This may contain some spoilers, so consider yourself warned.

One of the storylines concerns a young Rain Wilder named Thymara (I think she’s sixteen).  She has spent her entire life knowing she’s forbidden to mate, not only because her children would be too monstrous to survive, but also because the pregnancy and birthing might kill her.  When she leaves civilization with a group of other young outsiders, she never even considers breaking that rule.  She’s shocked to discover one of the other girls has been sleeping around, and outraged when the group’s self-appointed leader orders her to pick someone to keep the boys, who vastly outnumber the girls, from fighting over her.

One of the boys, Tats, is her friend from home.  The perfect choice, but she refuses to choose him (or anyone else).  It’s not an easy choice.  She does like him.  But she’s not in love with him, and she knows she’s not ready, and that she can’t afford to get pregnant (and that’s before she witnesses the other girl’s messy miscarriage).

I can’t remember the last time I actually rooted against a romantic attachment, but Hobb pulls it off here, and she does it brilliantly.  Part of it is how she portrays the selfishness of the boys—not enough to make them jerks, but enough to put me off.  Tats keeps pushing, accusing Thymara of teasing, of not being willing to take a small chance for him.

Her second suitor is even worse, giving her magical Elderling memories of a love affair between them (without so much as warning her), and then seducing her.  He obviously thinks of it as a grand romantic gesture, but to me, it reads like date rape.  Afterward, though, Thymara comes to her senses and realizes it shouldn’t happen again.  She doesn’t confuse passion with love, and doesn’t let pleasure circumvent her good sense.  Unfortunately, the book ended without anyone in the story recognizing what a violation it was.  I will be extremely disappointed if his bad behavior gets swept under the rug.

However the story plays out, though, I know Thymara’s not going to go starry-eyed.  If she ends up in a relationship, it will be based on real, lasting feelings, and no teenage boy is going to trick her into it.  She’s too strong to settle for anything less—and that’s an example a lot of teens could learn from, girls and boys alike.

The Rise of the Audiobook

Posted on by

It seems like everyone’s talking about audiobooks these days.  Where it used to be only the bestsellers and classics got audio versions, now I can find as many as 75% of the books I search for at Audible.  Perhaps most importantly, they’ve gotten cheaper: on my particular membership plan, I pay less than $10 per audiobook.  Compare that to $50 for a whole stack of CDs (or, you know, the list price at Audible).  This year, I’m on track to listen to more than twice as many as last year.

Not that I don’t still read–I’m at 153 books this year and counting (as compared to 47 on audio).  But life is increasingly busy, and audiobooks have a distinct advantage for times like my daily commute, when a print or ebook would be hazardous in extreme (not to mention illegal).

What I like best about audiobooks

  • Making use of wasted time*
    I tend to feel guilty when I waste all my writing time curled up with someone else’s book.  With audiobooks, I can listen while driving, doing housework, exercising, or doing any other routine task that requires my eyes (which, lets face it, is just about everything).
    *AKA multitasking, which is also one of the biggest downsides.  More on this later…
  • Easy on the eyes
    I’m the kind of person who likes to keep busy.  Not necessarily active (writer-engineer, here), but my mind engaged.  I’m also a very visual person.  Unfortunately, I get chronic headaches, often triggered by eyestrain, that sometimes turn into month-long migraines.  If I can’t read, and I can’t write, and I can’t even mess around on the internet, then the next best thing is to lay down in a nice, dark room with an audiobook to keep me company.
  • Narration
    Sometimes audio versions of a book are just okay, equal or even inferior to the printed version.  But when the narration is right, they can be so much richer and more powerful.  I’m a fast reader, and I admit that means I often skim, taking in the words without taking the time to savor them.  Audiobooks force me to slow down and enjoy.

Of course, audiobooks aren’t all rainbows and unicorns.  For one thing, it can take a week or more to listen to a book that I could rip through in a day.  And that whole multitasking thing?  Yeah, sometimes that doesn’t work so well, and I end up missing whole chunks of the story.

As I’ve branched out into a more diverse selection of audiobooks, I’ve noticed that they seem to fall into several categories:

  • Old favorites
    For me, The Wheel of Time, Pride and Prejudice, and The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.  These are the books I’ve read and re-read, and come back to listen to and love even more.  These are the best for multitasking, because I already know the story.
  • Slow and lyrical
    Books like Guy Gavriel Kay’s Tigana and Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander.  They take their time, and linger over the details, so they really have time to sink in, even if I’m only half paying attention.  Plus, the prose is so beautiful, my attention is less likely to stray.
  • Transparent as glass
    Books like Lois McMaster Bujold’s Vorkosigan Saga.  The pace keeps clipping forward, but it’s all so clear and easy to understand that I hardly miss a word, no matter what I’m doing.
  • Fast-paced muddle
    These are the ones I have the most trouble keeping track of: sword and sorcery, space opera, and the like.  The fun adventure-y books that are great to read, but maybe not so easy to follow with half an ear.  Fortunately for me, I haven’t come across many in this category.
  • Bad narration
    Then, of course, there are those unfortunate books whose wonderful stories and lovely prose are rendered unlistenable by a bad narrator.  Dull, annoying, whatever the reason, their words just won’t stay in my head.  This is why it’s always a good idea to listen to the previews before buying.

Fortunately, I can’t remember the last time I came across an unlistenable audiobook, and I’ve actually thought twice about buying some books as gifts because I wasn’t sure if they would live up to their full awesomeness without the narration.  So, yeah.  I’m hooked.  I doubt I’ll ever give up reading paper/ebooks, but I’m pretty sure audiobooks are now a permanent part of my entertainment mix.